Have you been charged with refusing to comply with Directions made by Police Regarding a Breath Analysis?
- Over 30 years experience in the criminal justice system
- Track record of success
- Nationally acclaimed expertise
Free Legal Advice 24/7
What does it mean to refuse to comply with directions regarding a breath analysis?
Refusing to comply with directions made by police regarding breath analysis is an offence under sections 49(1)(e) and 55 of the Road Safety Act 1986 (“RSA”). This applies to individuals driving or in charge of a motor vehicle who refuse to comply with a lawful requirement made by a police officer.
Relevant Directions for Breath Analysis
The directions to undergo breath analysis for blood alcohol concentration (“BAC”) that must be followed are specified under sections 55(1), (2), (2AA), (2A), and (9A) of the RSA.
Forms of Refusal
A refusal to comply with a requirement made by a police officer can take two forms:
- Verbal refusal: Expressing refusal through words.
- Conduct-based refusal: Failing to accompany a police officer to provide a sample or being physically uncooperative.
Section 55(1): Positive or Refusal to Take Preliminary Breath Test
If a person tests positive or refuses to undergo a preliminary breath test, section 55(1) allows a police officer to:
- Request the individual to undergo further breath analysis.
- Escort the person to a police car or station to provide a breath sample.
Section 55(2) and 55(2AA): Reasonable Belief of Alcohol/Drug Influence
Under sections 55(2) and 55(2AA) of the RSA:
- A police officer must have a reasonable belief that the individual was driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, or exceeded the legal limit, within the past 3 hours.
- The officer can require the individual to undergo an assessment, provide a breath analysis sample, or escort them to a police car or station for testing.
- The officer can also instruct the person to remain where they are until directed to leave.
Section 55(2A): Breathalyser Malfunction or Insufficient Sample
If a police officer believes that the breathalyser device malfunctioned or the sample was insufficient, section 55(2A) allows the officer to:
- Request the person to provide an additional sample, such as due to equipment malfunction or insufficient exhaled air.
Section 55(9A): Blood Sample Collection
Under section 55(9A) of the RSA:
- The driver may be required to provide a blood sample or be escorted to a place where the sample can be taken.
- The person must remain at the location until the sample is taken, or 3 hours have passed.
- The police officer must document the reason for the request and disclose the legal basis for the requirement.
What does the prosecution need to prove?
- You were driving or in charge of a motor vehicle?
- A police officer or authorised person placed a demand on you to provide a breath sample,
- You refused to comply with that demand.
Factors to consider:
Should I plead guilty or not guilty?
- What defences do I have available to me to minimise my penalty?
- Have three hours lapsed since I last drove the motor vehicle?
- Do you have previous offences exhibiting similar behaviour?
What defences are available?
- Police made the demand whilst being trespassers on private property: Whether police had lawful power to remain on your private property to make a demand can often be a complex area of law. Withdrawing a police officer’s implied licence to remain on your property can be made explicitly or implicitly by conduct.
- Unable to physically comply: Vulnerable persons, the elderly or those in wheel chairs may be physically unable to accompany police back to a place for the purposes of a breath test if the only means available at the time was the pod at the rear of the police vehicle. If police have not provided you with a safe means of transport this may be a defence depending on the circumstances.
- Being unaware of the demand: In years gone by an accused was entitled to an acquittal if the formalities of the demand were not properly made out, for example by being informed of the need to remain at the police station for up to 3 hours. However today, case law has narrowed this requirement. There are still cases where the evidence may prove that you were not made fully aware of a need to comply with the police demand to accompany.
Where will my case be heard?
Offences involving alcohol or drugs, specifically for refusing to comply with a requirement will be adjudicated in the Magistrates Court of Victoria.
Penalties for Refusing to Comply with a Requirement
If you are found guilty of an offence involving alcohol or other drugs for refusing to comply with a requirement, the maximum penalties are as follows:
- First Offence: A fine of up to 12 penalty units.
- Second Offence: A fine of up to 120 penalty units or imprisonment for up to 12 months.
- Third or Subsequent Offence: A fine of up to 180 penalty units or imprisonment for up to 18 months.
Additionally, under section 50(1B), if convicted of an offence under section 49(1)(e) for refusing to comply with a requirement made under section 55, the court is required to:
- Suspend your driver’s licence or learner permit, and
- Disqualify you from driving for a minimum period of:
- 2 years for a first offence.
- 4 years for any subsequent offence.
These disqualification periods are mandatory minimums, meaning the Magistrate must disqualify you from driving for at least these periods. However, they have the discretion to impose longer disqualification periods, especially for repeat offenders.
Testimonials
What people Say
-
I found myself again before the magistrates court for an indictable offence, I was worried about receiving a jail sentence because of my age and h... Read More5/5
-
I recently used the services of Marie Lukic of MK law. She is very professional, dedicated and knowledgeable lawyer. Extremely grateful to have Ma... Read More5/5
-
Thanks Marcus Denning for being with me from start to end and to give me a fantastic outcome from my trial..👏👏👏🎖🎖🎖🎖🎖🎖Fi... Read More5/5
-
I am jagmohan truely grateful and thankful for Jasmin Dhillon from MK Law who did an exceptional job on my case. She is highly skilled, talented ... Read More5/5
What happens next?
Contact MK Law today to get expert legal support for your case involving refusal to comply with a requirement. Our experienced team will guide you through each step, starting with an initial consultation to assess your situation and develop a tailored defence strategy.
We will help you prepare all necessary documentation and evidence, represent you in the Magistrates Court of Victoria, and advocate on your behalf. After the hearing, we’ll review the outcome, advise you on any penalties or appeals, and ensure you comply with court orders. If you need ongoing assistance or have further questions, MK Law is here to provide continuous support and protect your rights. Call 1800 130 120 today.
Free Legal Advice 24/7
Contact Us
Call Anytime For Free Legal Advice 24/7
Top 5 firms by reputation dealing with traffic and criminal law matters.
- 2/212 Barkly Street, St Kilda Victoria, 3182 Australia
- 1800 130 120
- marcus@mklawfirm.com.au